President Donald Trump has unveiled a sweeping initiative for Gaza’s post-conflict recovery, anchored by the newly established Board of Peace (also called the Peace Council or Committee). The plan includes a $7 billion relief fund, a controversial multinational military base, and ambitious governance reforms. However, the project is mired in criticism over legitimacy, lack of Palestinian consent, and international skepticism, with major powers questioning its compatibility with existing global institutions.
The Independent+2
The Board’s launch in Washington, DC drew figures like Javier Milei, Viktor Orbán, and Gianni Infantino, with nearly 20 countries represented—though most EU leaders and major powers were absent. Indonesia pledged up to 8,000 troops for the military base, while Japan joined in a semiconductor venture. The European Commission defended its role despite French objections, and Norway denied involvement. Notably, Israel refused to fund the Board, citing domestic politics and recent Gaza attacks, aiming to appease right-wing factions. Most delegates attended virtually, underscoring limited direct engagement.
China.org+2
Trump announced over $7 billion in relief for Gaza, with some sources citing a $10 billion US contribution and a $1 billion annual fee for permanent Board members. The plan also includes a $75 million football aid package and a US-Japan partnership to build a synthetic diamond factory for semiconductors. Critics question the transparency and motives behind these private-led initiatives, especially as UN aid remains insufficient and Gaza residents see little tangible progress.
The Independent+2
Central to the initiative is a military base in Gaza for 5,000 personnel, with phased construction of defensive structures and tunnels. The base, led by a Trump-chaired “Peace Committee” with Jared Kushner as a key figure, faces backlash for lacking Palestinian approval and being viewed as an occupation. Proposals also include a 12,000-strong police force and a 20,000-soldier contingent. The Palestinian Authority has a liaison office for reconstruction, but Israel rejects any PA administrative role, deepening regional divides.
China.org+2
The Board’s legitimacy is under fire for opaque funding, perceived US dominance, and unclear international backing. Russia has questioned how the Board would coordinate with the UN Security Council, which remains central to global peacemaking. Critics argue the Board leverages a weakened multilateral order for Trump’s personal influence, while a former US ambassador warned of diplomatic surprises ahead. Despite Trump’s claims of historic impact, skepticism persists locally and globally about the Board’s ability to deliver on its promises.
Reuters+2