The Unification Church, also known as the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, faces an unprecedented legal crisis after the Tokyo High Court upheld a March 2025 district court order for its dissolution on March 4, 2026, citing decades of financial exploitation. The ruling has triggered the start of liquidation proceedings and intensified calls for comprehensive victim relief. In response, the church has filed a special appeal with Japan’s Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the dissolution and halt the ongoing liquidation process, while legal and social debates continue to unfold.Mainichi Shimbun+2
The Tokyo High Court’s decision confirmed the district court’s findings of illegal donation practices and significant financial harm over 42 years, dismissing the church’s appeal and ordering its dissolution. The court emphasized the public interest in maintaining social order and criticized the church’s speculative financial claims and insufficient reforms. With the Supreme Court now set to review the church’s special appeal, the fate of the organization remains uncertain. If the Supreme Court overturns the order, liquidation will be halted; otherwise, the process will proceed.Mainichi Shimbun+2
Liquidation proceedings have begun, with the church’s assets earmarked for victim compensation. The National Federation of Lawyers' Unions convened in Tokyo on March 7, 2026, urging liquidators and courts to prioritize restitution for both current and potential future victims. Advocacy groups continue to press for expanded support, especially for second-generation members, as the government implements relief measures and legal support. Lawyers plan to meet with liquidators to ensure victims’ interests are central to the process.Asahi Shimbun+2
Following the dissolution order, internal conflict has intensified within the Unification Church. Former leader Tomihiro Tanaka resigned in December 2025 amid debates over apology and reform, after a memorial festival drew 1,500 participants in October. The church seeks to demonstrate improvement through legal compliance and compensation efforts, but faces reputational damage and scrutiny over its assets. The case has reignited national debate on religious regulation, political ties, and the protection of vulnerable individuals.Asahi Shimbun+2